Video

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Obama's Campaign Pledge is Realized

 
“Today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year”. Significant words came from President Barack Obama during a press conference on Friday as he announced the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq to have the last soldier leave by the end of 2011.
This announcement has some symbolic significance as well. It comes as perfect timing to the three other foreign policy accomplishments by the Obama administration. The first being the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan on May 1, following the drone killing of al-Qaida figure Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen and most recently the backing of actions that led to the end of dictator Moammar Gadhafi’s reign in Libya and subsequent death. The talks to leave Iraq are marked by the trip taken by then President Bush in late 2008. The farewell trip to Baghdad is most remembered because of the incident at a press conference in which an Iraqi journalist threw his shoe at President Bush and continued to call him a “dog”.  President Obama’s press conference on Friday outlined a much different and evolved relationship with the US and Iraq, one in which will now have to enter a new phase in maintaining peace and security.  
The plan in Iraq is to leave about 160 military personnel to be stationed at the American Embassy in Baghdad and 3,000-5,000 private security contractors as well as considerable CIA presence. The talks have been long and drawn out ever since President Obama’s first announcement to withdraw troops and end of combat in Iraq in late August 2010. The most notable push back is the issue of legal immunity for US soldiers. For a long time Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki and President Obama held negotiations about the legal protection of American soldiers. The Iraq government held steadfastly that American soldiers should be held accountable in Iraqi courts and be subjected to Iraqi punishment. The negotiations only became more complex with the release by Wiki leaks of a report that detailed the killing of Iraqi civilians, including children, in a 2006 raid by American troops. In recent weeks the negotiations in Baghdad revealed that such protection would be impossible. 
 With this huge announcement came a lot of expected criticism. The most obvious of the critics are Republican leaders. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney had strong words for President Obama when it came to the decision to bring home troops. Romney accused Obama of making a “naked political calculation” and ultimately called the President’s negotiations with the Iraqi government inept. Another Republican critic was found in Senator John McCain, who faced Obama in the 2008 election when the two candidates had polarizing ideals on the war. McCain called the withdrawal a “consequential failure” for the Obama administration.
Despite some criticism most Democrats in Washington support the latest decision. In fact, many see this as an opportunity to win over votes for the 2012 presidential election. As previously stated, the announcement to bring troops from Iraq home is the last of four important foreign policy accomplishments by Obama since he has taken office. While many Democratic strategists hope that these events will resonate with Americans it is known that voters care much more about domestic issues than they do about foreign policy. This is evident in the election of President Obama himself who was a first term Senator with little foreign policy experience. In spite of that the Obama campaign hopes to reap from the benefits at Presidential debates come November, claiming most of the Republican candidates, like businessman Herman Cain, have little experience in the field. Other benefits of this decision for the Obama campaign is the fact that ending this decade long war that cost Americans billions of dollars, will mark the beginning of the re-building of the nation’s economy.
The announcement on Friday was met with mixed emotions. While many feel the end of the Iraq war is an accomplishment and the homecoming of American troops as a good thing, others feel that the security of Iraq has been compromised and the influence of Iran will grow. It is clearly too early to know what the consequence will be but there is not doubt that the withdrawal of troops will stop the loss of American lives in Iraq and bring back the much missed family members and friends.
Below is a link from the New York Times website that includes an interactive timeline of the war in Iraq:

Sources:

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

The Democratic Platform 2008


1 The Co-chair of Democratic Party Platform, Patricia Madrid, speaks about what a party platform is in this clip from the C-SPAN video library. She also outlines the unique way in which the committee drafted the platform in 2008. 
  

The Democratic Platform 2008

This clip includes Patricia Madrid, the co-chair for the Democratic Platform Committee. She explains the importance of a party platform during an election especially in 2008 when the party was so divided.

Republican Party Platform 1996

The following clip includes Paul Manafort Senator Bob Dole's campaign manager explaining the recent production of a untied Republican Platform in 1996. This election was between Dole and the incumbent Bill Clinton. The clip also includes the delegates on the platform committee explaining the points of the platform with an emphasis on abortion.

What Happened in Vegas?

Candidates at the GOP Debate in Las Vegas, Source: Washington Post

As Representative Michelle Bachmann so aptly put it, “I hope tonight’s the one night that what happens in Vegas does not stay in Vegas”. And the candidates may have woken up with a headache but the cause was less likely due to heavy drinking and more likely the result of a hit from a fellow candidate . Last night was the fifth time these seven candidates met since Labor Day. This time, the Western Republican Leadership Conference debate was held at the Venetian Hotel’s conference center in Las Vegas and was hosted by CNN. Noticeably absent from the rambunctious affair was former Governor Jon Huntsman Jr., who boycotted the debate after Nevada decided to move up its caucuses ahead of New Hampshire, a move that is against Republican National Party rules. This move can be seen as significant tactic considering the New Hampshire primary may be held during the end of December. Huntsman’s decision to side with New Hampshire may be a last stitch attempt to gain votes there.
Tuesday’s debate was no doubt the most aggressive of all debates so far mostly because each candidate is aware that there is less than three months until the primaries begin. Throughout their two hours on stage is seemed that every candidate found it necessary to berate another peer about various policies and even moral standards. Although many believed that Herman Cain, former CEO, would be in the spotlight for his faulty economic plan entitles the 9-9-9 plan. He has also received attention for controversial public remarks about immigration and same sex marriage. Despite Cain’s hiccups, the candidates only seemed to focus on him for a short amount of time. Each candidate on stage repudiated the 9-9-9 plan claiming that it would raise the taxes of mostly middle class citizens. This information comes from a study organized by nonpartisan Tax Policy Center that was released Tuesday. The analysis found that those making less than $100,000 would suffer from a tax increase while it would lower the taxes of 95% of the nation’s millionaires.  Despite these facts, Cain continues to defend the plan and insists that no one understands it. However, it does not seem like Cain is willing to explain it to anyone.

Similar to past debates, former Governor Mitt Romney received a slew of attacks from fellow candidates however on Tuesday night it seemed that he had trouble defending himself. The common matchup between Romney and former Governor Rick Perry was especially present at the debate in Las Vegas. Perry introduced the issue of immigration, even though he himself had been under fire for his policies on the matter. Perry sited five year old newspaper reports that claimed Romney had hired illegal immigrants to service his lawn. In a heated moment the two candidates shouted over each other and at one point Romney even put his hand on Perry’s shoulder and insisted that is he wanted to be president, he should let both people speak. The behavior of both candidates was definitely different from past debates. Perry has experienced rather lackluster performances at the past two debates and decided to come out Tuesday the most aggressive he has ever been. Also although the Romney campaign had wanted to go into this debate expecting to win over the non supporters, it did not work out that way.
 Basically every candidate had something to say to Romney, who is still trying to characterize himself as the only realistic and plausible nominee. A significant attack came from former Senator Rick Santorum who has had difficulty appealing to the public although he hopes to be the conservative alternative to Romney. Santorum grilled Romney about the healthcare system he set up in Massachusetts and its supposed inspiration for Obama’s national healthcare system. Santorum claimed that Romney both inspired and supports the “Obamacare” that Republicans seek to appeal.

The debate as a result of the nearing primaries and the candidate’s plea to win support and attention became the feistiest debate of them all. The candidates focused on issues like foreign aid, religious values, and most importantly bickering. Surprisingly the topic of the economy was largely ignored. Since the Republican Primary calendar has become a virtual mess, the candidates must go into the next phase of campaigning. The first primary can be held as early as the end of December in New Hampshire. It would not be a surprise to see the candidates begin to camp out in the state in order to begin the stretch to the convention at the end of the summer.

Sources:

**Below is a video clip from the debate of Herman Cain defending his infamous 9-9-9 plan.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

FEC Reports Give Insight into Campaign


            Financial reports from the Federal Election Committee (FEC) have been released and give important information on how much money Republican and Democrat candidates have been fundraising as well as spending in the third quarter. The reports outline the financial details from primarily over the summer. The reports deliver insight into the campaign by outlining which candidates accumulated the most money or spent the most money on the campaign trail thus far.
            The FEC reports revealed the candidates that were able to raise the most money through donations and fundraising thus far. The top Republican candidate to achieve this was former Governor Mitt Romney. In the third quarter the Romney campaign raised about $14.2 million making his total $32million raised for the 2012 Presidential Election. Although this is a significant and impressive amount of money raised for the campaign, it still does not surpass the amount of money in the Obama campaign. Merely in the last three months the Obama campaign has raised $42 million making the total $61 million. Such figures from the Obama campaign dwarf the numbers that came from the top GOP contenders. The reason the substantial amount of money President Obama has raised is due to the fact that he has no opponent. As a result the Democratic Party only has one candidate or choice to give donations to. 
President Barack Obama, source: Google Images
              Romney and Obama do not just have exceptional fundraising abilities in common. Another similarity is where these candidates raise a portion of their money; wall street. Although as a result of the FEC reports, it seems that Romney has beat Obama in terms of amount donated from Wall Street firms and employees. Over the past three months, as outlined in the financial reports, Romney has raised $1.5 million from employees of Wall Street firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs while Obama has only been able to receive $270,000 from similar outlets. Goldman Sachs is an interesting aspect of this story because in 2008 during Obama’s run in the Presidential Election, the firm’s employees donated $1 million while this year they donated a mere $45,000. The reports note that Romney was donated $350,000. It seems that Wall Street employees and firms are turning away from the Democratic nominee and throwing their support behind Romney, hoping to receive the support back if he makes it to office.

            FEC reports show that the other Republican contender to raise a substantial amount of money for his campaign is Rick Perry who in the third quarter raised $17 million and has $15 million in the bank. Other candidates like Herman Cain raised $2.8 million with $1.3 million on hand. Representative Ron Paul also has been able to raise $8 million with $3.6 million in the bank by September.
            For some candidates, the ability to raise substantial amounts of money has been a struggle. Some candidates have even found themselves in debt after spending more money on the campaign than they were receiving in donations. Newt Gingrich, for example, was only able to raise $807,962.45 during the third quarter while spending $776,767.90 on the campaign. Consequently this put the Gingrich campaign in debt for $1.1 million with $$353,416.71 in the bank.  It is reported that Gingrich spent the largest amount of money on website development and telemarketing, $127,000 and $107,701 respectively. In a similar situation is former Senator Rick Santorum. In the third quarter, Santorum is believed to have raised $700,000 while spending $750,000. This put his campaign $70,000 in debt with $190,000 in the bank. Jon Huntsman Jr. has only $327,000 left in his campaign account with more than twice that in debt.
GOP Candidate Herman Cain, source: Google Images
          With the handling of such large amounts of money it would be interesting where and what the candidates use their donations for. One of the uses of the FEC reports is to examine and review such issues. For example Rick Perry has spent $2 million since his entry into the race in mid-August. The ways in which Perry spent this money are $460,000 on travel, $103,000 on consultants and $46,320 on printing and direct mail solicitations.

            The release of the FEC reports give a clear indication about which candidates seem the strongest and can last the longest as the campaign rages on into the winter. There seems to be a large gap between GOP candidates. While a few are exceeding estimated donation sums, others are falling into debt. Such candidates will quickly realize how difficult it will be to participate in the Presidential Election without a large bank account and people willing to give donations. 

Sources: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/us/romney-perry-and-cain-open-wide-financial-lead-over-field.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&ref=politics
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/gingrich-raises-807k-spends-almost-same-amount-in-3rd-quarter/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/romney-raises-142-million-in-third-quarter/2011/10/14/gIQA23GfjL_blog.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44914805/ns/politics-decision_2012/#.Tps1ubKLMse
                                     

Saturday, October 15, 2011

2012 Republican National Convention Controversy

This clip from the C-SPAN video library consists of an interview with the Chair of the Republican Party of Florida Lenny Curry. In the clip he announces that the Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa. Also discussed is the controversy surrounding the announcement in terms of Florida's decision to hold their primaries earlier than usual.